English Law

“The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the crown. It may be frail – its roof may shake – the wind may blow through it – the storm may enter – the rain may enter – but the King of England cannot enter.”
William Pitt, the first Earl of Chatham, also known as Pitt the Elder 1763

English Law & The English Constitution

In England the Government cannot do what it likes, whilst this may not seem the case in their performance and behaviour today, their powers are supposed to be curtailed and capped by the People, in the form of, an Annulment by Trial by Jury case, in which the Jurors can annul any parliamentary legislation that they feel infringes on their absolute Rights, enshrined under English Law.

Common Law Constitution Explained: https://www.commonlawconstitution.org/

English Castle Doctrine Explained: https://rumble.com/v52b8mf-castle-doctrine-england-britain.html

Sovereign Empowerment: https://www.sovereignnaturalempowerment.com/the-truth

FCO30/1048 - A Case for Treason

"This originally classified Government document remained secret until 2001...

...when it was released to the Public Record Office at Kew under the 30 year rule which kept documents out of the public domain, including from politicians, until no doubt, it was expected it would no longer matter.

In short, the file shows that the Heath Government was made fully aware ofthe consequences of enacting the Bill, ECA(72) and that it would lead to a loss of sovereignty and democracy and was therefore treasonable[6]. The FCO 30/1048 analysis provided a stunningly accurate image of the future that joining the EEC would entail. It shows that they were fully expecting Britain to effectively cease to exist as a self-governing, independent state by the turn of the century (1999/2000).

The sponsors of the documents had clear intent – to conceal the loss of sovereignty involved from the politicians who would be voting on the Bill, ECA(72) a few months later, on 28th October. Had these findings on sovereignty been revealed publicly at the time, as they should have been, is it conceivable that ECA(72) would not have been confined to the dustbin of history?

Geoffrey Rippon who, as we see above, was fully acquainted with the the effects upon sovereignty when he introduced the motion to Parliament on the 15th February 1972 – the Bill’s Second and main reading, stated: “there would be no essential surrender of sovereignty...”.

The EU A Corporatist's Racket David Barmby - Download the Full Book Here

With FCO30/1048, perhaps ask Farage why he
never raised this during the Brexit Campaign...